Discussion on Businesses and Wrestling : Speakers & Interviews
|
Get the Flash Player to see this player.
|
Joe ReasbeckDiscussion on Businesses and WrestlingNovember 22, 2009 I talked a little bit with Joe Reasbeck on his thoughts on business and should people make money off wrestling.
About Joe Reasbeck
Tags:
Rate this Video
Flocasts (4)
Fans of this video |



http://www.southparkstudios.com/episodes/251887
We get taught all of our wrestling career the principle that if we work hard, it will be rewarded, both intrinsically and extrinsically. The harder you work, the more you win, the better you improve and achieve. Yet, after this training for years, we then get plopped into the unionized world of public education employment of junior highs, high schools, and even colleges that begin by lowballing their prices for top notch coaches to almost insulting levels of entry level teachers, despite the remarkable and elite credentials that many coaches bring to the table. No wonder people leave and pursue other industries where success is actually rewarded, incentives drive training and performance, and where poor training/performance is equally matched with a poor reward. You can never fix wrestling in the compensation manner, never address these issues of allowing people the ability to honorably profit off of the sport while keeping the sport equally honest, without addressing the much broader issues of unionized labor in the education system that employs the lion share of our coaches, and refuses to allow them to be fired for bad performance, even though their athletes can still be benched or pinned for bad performance. Ironic, huh?
How attractive is it to a state champ, All american college wrestler who has spend his entire life working hard to outcompete the competition to achieve success, to then face down a job where he will be underpaid, underappreciated by professional colleagues (principles, ADs, teachers, adminstrations), and be paid as a public teacher with no incentive to perform, no incentive to win team and indiv titles, and no accountability after a meager 3 year tenure process if they remain mediocre and dont win? Only the rare, top programs seem to deviate from this model, because otherwise it requires the complete self sacrifice of a labor of love for a career.
Put a college All-american in this model, and it instantly becomes frustrating when he knows he has elite skills, abilities, and training to be far more successful in many other industries or fields in order to provide better for a family equivalent to the quantity and caliber of the work effort that he invests on the front end.
Its systemic, and broader than just wrestling. If you raise the issue of incentives, making money for the labor of wrestling and coaching, this conversation can not be had in a viable manner without also including a major addressing of the unionized labor issues of public education. In my view, at least, unless you want to privatize the whole sport, and I dont think gymnastics is anything close to a model of success for that based upon history.