160lbs Alec Ortiz -OR vs. Dallas Bailey Catoosa-Ok : Speakers & Interviews



Get the Flash Player to see this player.
 URL: 

Enter Your Name

or Login Here
Please enter this code to post comment. Login to skip Captcha.
captcha img

#52
Dapper Dan 09   October 9 at 10:11am
Kolb pounded Ortiz 8-3 (all of Ortiz's points were when Kolb let him up) and Kemerer handled Bailey 5-2 in the Dapper Dan about 1-2 weeks before this.
reply  
#51
Overuler   October 2 at 11:04am
If your going to talk about a rule you should learn it first. Once locked hands are called the match does not continue for a brief period of time allowing someone the chance to start an escape. The match is stopped "immediately" unless the escape is already in progress.
reply  
#50
Talk About Getting Screwed   August 13 at 3:04pm
that locked hands call was ridiculous... the ref has to let the offensive wrestler know he scored the takedown otherwise there's no reason for him to release the lock
reply  
#49
Oregonian   August 11 at 11:08pm
Ortiz is going to Minnesota
reply  
#48
Lonzo Davis   August 11 at 10:53pm
both of ya are raw i meaqn damn if i could scramble like that i would not ever loss good job to both of ya and good luck in college.
reply  
#47
Scott Valley   August 2 at 8:48pm
Dont agree with the lock hands call but...Great match either way. Hopefully they see each other again in college. Where is Ortiz going to school?
reply  
#46
Vaisforlovers   August 2 at 4:49pm
refs drop the ball again. what a joke
reply  
#45
Aaron Long   May 16 at 4:17pm
Rule said:
First off, once a wrestler is awarded the takedown, they cannot lock their hands around both legs. In every state in the nation, that should be called locked hands.
I think the ref should have let him know he had a takedown -- you know, by saying "two takedown" so he can hear it. Otherwise, he is continuing his takedown to a pinning combination with locked hands -- which is leagal (in any state in the nation -- (except for maybe Mississippi where people don't wrestle).
reply  
#44
Aaron Long   May 16 at 4:12pm
tanner blank said:
the clasping was not on the nearfall but for when he locked hands at about 4:38
there was not control awarded at 4:38
reply  
#43
Anonymous Coward   April 29 at 3:15pm
thats bogus at the end of the 2nd. you need to put up the 2 point takedown and verbally tell the wrestler before he can be expected to let go of his clasp.
reply  
#42
Anonymous Coward   April 20 at 8:40pm
So and so beat so and so once and one guy wrestled this other guy and so and so beat this one guy and he beat this other guy who beat that guy and he lost to the other guy.

So that one guy I mentioned wooduh beat that one guy that beat that other guy.
reply  
#41
Anonymous Coward   April 20 at 4:31pm
Bailey was clearly gassed at the end of that one - saved by the clock
reply  
#40
Im Convinced.   April 19 at 10:02pm
ive wrestled both of these gentleman as well as kenny courts from central dauphin who is a sophmore and i am 100% confident that kenny courts is probably better than both of these gentleman. and probably jake kemerer is the best 160 pounder
reply  
#39
Dapper Dan   April 3 at 9:42am
and to answer some of question#30 kemerer beat dallas 5-2 im not sure but the final score of the other match was but it was no contest
reply  
#38
Dapper Dan   April 3 at 9:39am
both of these kids lost to pennsylvania wrestlers in the dapper dan classic
reply  
#37
Anonymous Coward   April 2 at 10:39pm
how can you call locking hands when your face to face with your opponent?
reply  
#36
Anonymous Coward   April 1 at 9:51pm
nasty duck
reply  
#35
Trevor Brown   April 1 at 1:32pm
good scrambling match. chess match.
reply  
#34
Dave   April 1 at 12:51am
I actually think Ortiz never had control- look at their position when the buzzer goes off at 4:54.

I don't think Ortiz can complain too much about the calls in that situation . He came out ahead- net gain of one point when none should have been awarded.
reply  
#33
Dave   April 1 at 12:45am
The takedown is called at 4:50. At that point Ortiz's hands are locked. Bailey doesn't go to his back until 4:53. Clearly should be called locking hands- no back points. The only reason Ortiz was able to put him on his back is because his hands were locked.

Hypothetical scenario: If I'm on top, lock my hands around a guy's waist, and then 3 seconds later gut wrench him to his back, I don't get back points, I get called for a technical violation. From a rules standpoint- it's basically the same scenario here. (Although on the human level it's a little more forgivable given the way the takedown was called. Ortiz may not have been aware he'd been awarded 2 even though the ref signaled it clearly.)
reply  
#32
Adfio   March 30 at 9:21pm
bailey is gonna be a more succesful collegiate wrestler.
reply  
#31
John Stepleton   March 30 at 7:21pm
Kinda unsual how niether ref gave the singal for locking hands nor did they verbally say "Locking Hands" to the wrestlers, overall an exciting match, an what about the nearfall?? Completly took the 2 points away
reply  
#30
Anonymous Coward   March 30 at 2:56pm
When did Kermerer and Kolb face these guys? Details and scores?
reply  
#29
Jyrt   March 30 at 2:51pm
6:33 dirty takedown of the week
reply  
#28
Wvalum   March 30 at 12:53pm
WHoever said that bailey dominated is an idiot. That was an bad call on the locking hands. He had him on his back.
reply  
#27
Rule   March 30 at 10:29am
Lets just get this "home cooking" call out of the way right now. First off, once a wrestler is awarded the takedown, they cannot lock their hands around both legs. In every state in the nation, that should be called locked hands. Furthermore, once a locked hands call is made, the match continues for a brief period of time - giving the other wrestler time to score an escape. Once a locked hands call is made, the top wrestler cannot score any back points no matter the situation. The perimeter offical did his job and called it. It WAS the right call, not "home cookin" as some of you whine for.
reply  
#26
Vince DeAugustine   March 30 at 7:56am
I can't understand why Kemerer and Kolb didn't get picked. They dominated both of these guys
reply  
#25
GottaLoveIt   March 30 at 12:31am
Ortiz was lucky to even be awarded that take down. That ref avoided stoppin the match just to give him a chance, and he still barely pulled it out. He got out wrestled, hands down. Not to say that it would go that way every match, but it did this time.
reply  
#24
Tanner Blank   March 30 at 12:18am
the clasping was not on the nearfall but for when he locked hands at about 4:38
reply  
#23
Mrdunbar   March 29 at 11:56pm
one of those refs reffed at d-1's this year...
reply  
#22
Captain   March 29 at 11:43pm
terrible refs... ortiz won that one, clearly.
reply  
#21
Anonymous Coward   March 29 at 9:40pm
You can't lock hands when you have a guy on his back and are getting back points. The refs could have called locked hands right before he took him to his back after they awarded the takedown and before he took him to his back. However, you can't be called for locked hands when you have a guy in a pinning combo which Ortiz did when he rolled and took him to his back. In my opinion you either give the back points or don't...but the locked hands was a ridiculous call.
reply  
#20
Anonymous Coward   March 29 at 7:29pm
oritz is a f.ag
reply  
#19
LoSt   March 29 at 5:16pm
that was a really bizzare locked hands call... I dont k now why the ref held off on calling that takedown for so long, that was some pretty poor officiating
reply  
#18
Wrastler 150   March 29 at 4:09pm
so what does that say about USAW then? not exactly hiring the best refs for this big dual.
reply  
#17
Refs   March 29 at 4:01pm
The Refs are hired by USA wrestling not Oklahoma
So there's no home cooking there
reply  
#16
Anonymous Coward   March 29 at 3:23pm
locking hands while the guy is on his back? that's a new one for me. homecooking yet again.
reply  
#15
ORE   March 29 at 3:17pm
"at least when cali sends boys to the dapper dan, they win!!
oregon, you effin suck!"
this is the dream team dual also, geiger and fortune won last year..
reply  
#14
Anonymous Coward   March 29 at 3:15pm
ca won against mediocre kids. OR wrestled top level competiton and lost, even if the refs homecooked those matches.
reply  
#13
jerseyboys   March 29 at 3:15pm
A.C. is right you can lock hands when scoring near fall .
reply  
#12
Elbow   March 29 at 1:41pm
anybody else see the elbow to the head at the end haha
reply  
#11
Anonymous Coward   March 29 at 1:12pm
i thought you could keep your hands locked after a takedown when scoring nearfall criteria
reply  
#10
Woah   March 29 at 1:10pm
Bailey is one funky cat
reply  
#9
Joe   March 29 at 12:50pm
that was one hell of a battle!
reply  
#8
Cali!   March 29 at 12:19pm
at least when cali sends boys to the dapper dan, they win!!
oregon, you effin suck!
reply  
#7
Anonymous Coward   March 29 at 12:14pm
beat
reply  
#6
Anonymous Coward   March 29 at 12:13pm
ok. better wrestler lost? he has bet this kid more than once!
reply  
#5
Curtis   March 29 at 11:20am
the better wrestler lost this one. lil home cookin with the lack of back points and locked hands. 3 point swing. Bailey can't defend his legs
reply  
#4
Oklahoma   March 29 at 10:50am
Anonymous Coward said:
bailey gets his ass kicked the whole match and wins......wrestling is a funny sport sometimes.
Bailey getting his ass kickedd the whole match lmao ok.... Bailey won hands down Bailey is one of the best at 160 hands down.
reply  
#3
Fan   March 29 at 10:26am
bailey wrestled great, he earned that win
reply  
#2
Anonymous Coward   March 29 at 10:23am
bailey gets his ass kicked the whole match and wins......wrestling is a funny sport sometimes.
reply  
#1
Blax34   March 29 at 10:00am
nice call in there with the locked hands gotta love when a main ref will actually listen to the observer
reply  

Dallas Bailey


160lbs Alec Ortiz -OR vs. Dallas Bailey Catoosa-Ok

March 29, 2009

About Dallas Bailey 

Current School:Catoosa Hs
Rate this Video
4.7/5 (18 votes cast)

Coverages Dallas Bailey is part of (7):

+/- Show All