the first fleeing the mat was a justifyable call but the second one was not the escape was a good call the ref gave josh 1 point he didnt earn but winston coulda and probably shoulda gotten called for stalling once or twice so the point still would have been there
first fleeing the mat call was justified, second one wasn't, but then at the end winston should of been hit again for stalling, which gives condon the point anyways, definately a close match, but winston won on the feet and turned out to be the difference in the match
and that was no escape at the end either