Back to Topics

Olympic Team Now vs Then

Craig Vitagliano 11 months ago

with the London Games quickly approaching, I was hoping to get a fun discussion going about the USA Olympic Team 20 years ago v. today's team..

Keep in mind that the 1992 team had one of the best US performances, coming away with 3 Golds, 2 Silvers, & 1 Bronze.


Since there’s only 7 weights today v. 10 in 1992, I have to adjust for today’s weights..


How do you guys think each team would fare?


2012 team v. 1992 team


55 Sam Hazewinkle v. Zeke Jones


60 Coleman Scott v. Kendall Cross


*60 kg Coleman Scott v. John Smith


66 Jared Frayer v. Townsend Saunders


74 Jordan Burroughs v. Kenny Monday


84 Jake Herbert v. Kevin Jackson


96 Jake Varner v. Chris Campbell


*96 Jake Varner v. Mark Coleman


120 Tervel Dlagnev v. Bruce Baumgartner

7067 views

Comments34 comments

HuskerJohn 11 months ago

It is amazing to see how similar the styles are btwn '92 and '12 teams. This is a great question with a lot of right answers. We are all biased (if you are of a certain age) because we have results to influence our perceptions. I cannot wait for you to revisit this question in September after the games. Again,great job stirring the pot.

Anonymous Coward 11 months ago

anyone saying jordan burroughs would win is wrong, kenny would toss jordan on his dome. kenny made the olympic team 3 times in a row. Kenny has a gold medal, how many does jordan have?

kingdum 11 months ago

AC's comment reminded me of the purported conversation Ty Cobb had with a reporter. The reporter asked Cobb, "if you were playing baseball today what do you think your batting average would be?". Cobb said, "only about .325". The reporter then said, "is that because of night games, better gloves, different baseballs, etc?". And Cobb replied in a huff, "no, its because I'm 75 years old"!

Anonymous Coward 11 months ago

2012 team would win a close match, only because the 1992 team is getting old now.

Did you meant the 92 team in their prime?? That would be too obvious.

Cooper 11 months ago

@ mc "spontaneus bustion" - Left the "com" out and close enough on spontaneous.

If anything - this kind of points to the drop off in wrestling in the US over the years - primarily as college programs have dropped it due to Title IX. The programs that dropped wrestling also impacted HS teams - fewer opportunities for scholarships, etc.
Always tough to compare athletes a generation or more apart - but I would agree that the 1992 team was probably better. Probably win by 5-2, with 2-3 individual matches being dominated. Legends tend to grow larger as time passes by and I think that is happening here.

Anonymous Coward 11 months ago

Kendall Cross would shut out cloeman scott 6-0, 6-0 easily, without a doubt

mtm 11 months ago

to the guy talkin about metcalf being a robot... well sir your a tool.... how many times have you won NCAA's... robot beats tool everytime...

Craig Vitagliano 11 months ago

Craig ~~ Not even Close... 1992 Team- Wins- Hands Down....and Kenny Monday.... would have more "Air-Time" ....on Burroughs...Then Delta-Airlines can give out.....Monday was a "STUD" ....every time Burrough's would try to hit a Double....He would find Himself in the Next State....

Now how about the 1972 USA Team-VS-1992 USA Team.........Now that is a Match....?
Kyle Klingman of The Wrestling Mall wrote an article a few years back about his thoughts on the 92 v 72 team. Some of the scores are ridiculous, but it's a fun read..

http://www.wrestlingpod.com/wrestling-news/w1391/us-olympic-freestyle-dream-dual-1972-vs-1992/

Aaron Dowden 11 months ago

1992 by death

Anonymous Coward 11 months ago

Burroughs vs Monday would be a great match. Neither won has the clear advantage.

I am leaning towards Burroughs, personally. He may very well turn out to be one of our all time greats if he accomplishes the goals he has set out for himself.

hlywdboc1 11 months ago

Craig ~~ Not even Close... 1992 Team- Wins- Hands Down....and Kenny Monday.... would have more "Air-Time" ....on Burroughs...Then Delta-Airlines can give out.....Monday was a "STUD" ....every time Burrough's would try to hit a Double....He would find Himself in the Next State....

Now how about the 1972 USA Team-VS-1992 USA Team.........Now that is a Match....?

hlywdboc1 11 months ago

Craig ~~ Not even Close... 1992 Team- Wins- Hands Down....and Kenny Monday.... would have more "Air-Time" ....on Burroughs...Then Delta-Airlines can give out.....Monday was a "STUD" ....every time Burrough's would try to hit a Double....He would find Himself in the Next State....

Now how about the 1972 USA Team-VS-1992 USA Team.........Now that is a Match....?

Anonymous Coward 11 months ago

1992 whips 2012 soundly!

55 - Jones over Haz
60 - Cross over Scott
60 - Smith over anybody!
66 - Saunders over Frayer (could be a close one)
74 - Burroughs over Monday
84 - Jackson over Herbert
96 - Campbell over Varner
96 - Varner over Coleman
120 - Baumgartner over Dlagnev

ropeadope 11 months ago

I think the big difference is we need guys doing two or three Olympic cycles like John,Kenny, and Bruce. I know it's hard to compare different eras but I think the 1992 team was very special and in my opinion would wax this years Olympic team. Obviously MMA will continue to draw some of our elite wrestlers away and I know it would take big time money but USA Wrestling needs to sign our elite athletes to nice contracts through Olympic cycles. I know the money for winning gold, etc but in my opinion that's not enough. What is Burroughs getting paid right now by USA Wrestling?

Isaac 11 months ago

Burroughs v. Monday Would Probably be The Same As When Kenny Monday Had His Rivalry With Nate Carr, Great Match.

arm-spin 11 months ago

Agree on Burroughs vs Monday- so awesome to consider! Especially with Monday's throwing ability.

Overall- Smith, Jones and probably Jackson are big favorites, giving the edge to the 92 team.

Gable student 11 months ago

Really don't think athletes today are superior athletely to today's athletes. I actually think that back in 92 guys were more athletic. There were more three sport athletes than today's athletes that focus on one sport. One this for sure is guys were 10 times tougher back then. Technique has not evolve that much since 92. We really haven't had a guy like John smith that change they way we wrestling. Everybody tried to be a John Smith, then it was Cael, now Burroughs. Guys can not duplicate Burroughs style. I think now we focus too much on technique instead of god giving athletic ability. I love Metcalf to death but he looks like a robot out there. He is really a athletic guy that need to use his god giving ability.

Jake F 11 months ago

I got Varner and...maybe Burroughs, maybe

Travis Traxler 11 months ago

Dlagnev won't go down as one of our all-time greats..." Not sure about that, Tervel started wrestling as a freshmen in HS and is still making incredible improvements! He could have 2 more Olympic runs, etc. Still early to limit him is all I'm saying.

J W 11 months ago

Yikes, agree with the other comments (mostly a drubbing by the '92 team), but Burroughs in his prime (now) beats Monday in '92. Not sure about the outcome if it was the '88 Monday. Also, re the 'best training to beat JB's style', I don' think it's possible to train to beat raw speed. Who can they train with to duplicate it? Like trying to train to defense Tom Brady.

anonymous 11 months ago

keep in mind that today's athletes are bigger and stronger than their historical counterparts. also, today's athletes have the benefit of watching and learning from yesterday's greats.

Anonymous Coward 11 months ago

Progress in plain sight. 2012 7-0.

Gable student 11 months ago

Townsend Sanders would be a multiple world champ with today's rule.

Gable student 11 months ago

Varner can't beat an 43 year old chris Campbell at the time.

Caleo 11 months ago

Burroughs would be the only guy with a clear shot of winning. Varner is a distant second. And I say this feeling quite good about several of our wrestlers at this years games.

bwh27 11 months ago

I think Varner is a favorite in both those match-ups primarily due to defense being more advanced today than back then. Campbell won bronze in '92 but gave up more points than Varner does against elite wrestlers. Dlagnev won't go down as one of our all-time greats whereas Baumgartner is the most decorated American by far, but if Tervel can beat Taymazov then it's a mistake to think of that match as a foregone conclusion especially given the 20 years of technical advancements. Burroughs-Monday is a dream match-up, no idea who would win. If Jordan wins the Olympics after all the best have trained to beat his style then I would give him the edge. Think of it this way, maybe '88 or '89 Monday is better than 2011 Burroughs, but it's hard to fathom 1992 Park Jang Soon as better than the best performer at 2011 World Championships (according to Russian coach). All the other match-ups the '92 team destroys 2012.

TJ X 11 months ago

The only match that today's team MAY win is the Varner matchup, period.

nc 11 months ago

92 beats the crap out of todays team

Jimbo Flo 11 months ago

1992 was one of the best team performances in US history.

Leave a Comment

Recent Activity