Gene Stevens » States you make call
Get notified with every new Gene Stevens Video.
or
or comment anonymously!
|
|
2 months ago
Nothing! No points. |
|
|
2 months ago
i dont know what state you live in but that is not 2. |
|
|
2 months ago
He didn't have any control, so no points would be scored. Good call |
|
|
3 months ago
Great no call by this official. |
|
|
3 months ago
none, good no call |
|
|
5 months ago
Most of the time in high school when a scramble is like that and a wrestler is put on his back for a 2 second pause it is usually 2 TD and 2 fall |
|
|
5 months ago
no points, great call |
|
|
6 months ago
No control. Good no call! |
|
|
7 months ago
Good no call. |
|
|
7 months ago
Tough one.. what has to be decided is when he held him in criteria of a near fall did he have control enough to be awarded a takedown. I say no, so therefore no points are to be awarded. |
|
|
9 months ago
|
|
|
11 months ago
no points. there shoudn't even be a discussion about this one |
|
|
11 months ago
In PA, we call that 0 points. No control, so no back. |
|
|
12 months ago
there is definitely control, he put the guy defending the shot on his back and held him there for over a five count, 5 points. |
|
|
12 months ago
2 takedown after he pops his head a split second before the times called.. everything before that is a scramble, people are going to be exposed in those positions.. |
|
|
12 months ago
nadda |
|
|
12 months ago
Big fat dramatic goose egg. |
|
|
12 months ago
There was no points there, if the guy in the blue singlet was completely flat on his back or broke his grip during that defensive tilt then it woulda been 2+2, but he held on and there was no control from before, so it's no point anywhere. |
|
|
12 months ago
some people r saying it should have been 2. |
|
|
12 months ago
The only way to get that two is to be in Carver w/ 7-10 thousand fands frantic. TWOOOOO. but its not two. |
|
|
12 months ago
None |
|
|
12 months ago
I'm going to have to go with 4, two takedown w/ two nearfall. The position might be awkward, but the object of the match is stay off your back, it was perfectly exposed. |
|
|
12 months ago
For a takedown to be given there has to be no reasonable doubt that the attacking wrestler has control. In this scramble there is reasonable doubt. There for NO POINTS |
|
|
12 months ago
|
|
|
12 months ago
No points. No control. |
|
|
12 months ago
Two for the takedown when the defending wrestler breaks his grip I counted to three before time expired. Which gives him 4 points. |
|
|
2 years ago
ZERO! reaction time might be a factor here were the aggressive wrestler actually in control, but this is not the case. Exposing your back while both are neutral does not automatically award your opponent points nor does it sest that you've been taken down. Imagine if there was no control while trying to funk out of an opponents leg attack by passing the leg. Should ref's automatically start counting off back points and give the opponent two if you get stuck mid passing? there has to be something more conclusive, and I think ref's are better to err on the side of caution when awarding points. It makes wrestlers work harder, anyway, to earn the points |
|
|
2 years ago
takedown and two backs. |
|
|
2 years ago
Too easy ZERO |
|
|
2 years ago
nothing no control on the backs n never popped his head out |
